Book Review: Socratic Logic [V. 3.1] by Peter Kreeft Ph.D. | #Books #Smartreads #Education

An Indispensable Piece For The Autodidact; A Vital Component To Education For Individuals Of All Ages

BreakawayIndividual.com
Zy Marquiez
January 31, 2020

“Profound simplicity = common sense. – The height of cultivation runs to simplicity of common sense; the straightest, most logical way.”[1]

“The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence. Science is simply common sense at its best – that is, rigidly accurate information, and merciless to fallacy in logic.”
– Thomas Huxley

Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft PhD is an essential book because it has the capacity of helping every single individual in countless ways. This is because logic allows an individual to cast a firm foundation for all education that follows, which junctions into every other topic an individual will learn from in life.

Likewise, Logic allows for individuals to streamline their thought process – to think in sequential order, thus accomplishing more in the most efficient way that is logically sound. Further, Logic can help individuals read more thoroughly, process information more clearly and effectively, express information in a more in-depth and incisive fashion, and features myriad other tangential benefits as well. There are no limits to how much Logic can help in, for there are no limits to learning.

And given the unfortunate circumstance that Logic has been all but removed from most curricula in modern Academia, the benefits of Logic are not being experienced by nigh anyone in modern culture. This means that individuals must be proactive in their ventures to not only study and learn Logic, but seek to master it as it was once taught in schooling if they are to implement this knowledge and skillset into their repertoire.

One of the greatest strengths of Socratic Logic is that it showcases a very in-depth approach into learning Logic, but better yet, in an easy-to-digest and wholly accessible manner. Another strength of this book is that the lessons woven within its pages are not only thorough enough, but clearly divided in very user-friendly chapters that are not only flexible, but follow common sense and build upon themselves.

Describing the book as ‘user-friendly’ or ‘accessible’ might be a misnomer, but when juxtaposed to The Organon by Aristotle, which is a vastly more complex and demanding read, this book is a ‘walk in the park’. This ease of accessibility is one of its countless benefits of this book.

Kreeft makes it a point to give individuals many of the mental tools they might need to comprehend traditional Logic as it was once taught within schooling in the past. The book is sprinkled generously with many real world examples, historical incidents, significant quotes and instructive issues that allow for a latitude of learning that is robust, and yet significant. Moreover, this book is quite practical in its application once the concepts are mastered and implemented into one’s repertoire.

The book also features a differentiation between the basic sections (B) and the philosophical sections (P) which are marked in the table of contents. This helps the reader immensely in focusing on whatever specific area the reader might want to hone their skills in.

Also of note, the book – as mentioned by Kreef and corroborated by personal use – may be used in at least 10 different ways:

[1] the basics only
[2] the basic sections plus the philosophical sections
[3] the basic sections plus the more advanced sections in logic
[4] the basic sections plus the practical application sections
[5] the basic sections plus any two of these three additions
[6] all of the book
[7] all or some of it supplemented by a text in symbolic logic
[8] all or some of it supplemented by a text in inductive logic
[9] all or some of it supplemented by a text in rhetoric or informal logic
[10] all or some of it supplement by readings in and applications to the great philosophers[2]

What one gathers from the book will greatly depend on how much time one chooses to spend learning the tenets from it. Socratic Logic may be studied independently for an autodidact, as part of personal self-directed learning system, or it can even be studied in single class lessons, once a week lessons, semester formats, etc.

A healthy amount of exercises throughout the book further buttress one’s understanding of the subject matter. This multifarious approach definitely helps individuals attain a deeper understanding of the concepts shown in the book with utmost precision.

Taking all that into account, Socratic Logic should be taught to everyone not only because it allows individuals to set a firm foundation for all learning that follows, but also because our society lacks Logic in myriad ways. This glaring issue would go to explain why many of the societal issues that we are experiencing are happening in the first place.

In an age where information abounds, not being educated in Logic and its foundational aspects – that have the capacity to affect every crevice of our lives – is a serious mistake, for understanding cannot be attained without a firm foundation in education, and a firm foundation in education cannot be achieved without Logic.

And if conventional schooling continues on the downhill grade it’s currently in, knowledge in areas such as this will be worth more than its weight in gold, and that’s not an understatement. With the student loans costing over a trillion dollars collectively and real education dissipating right before our eyes within the conventional establishment, taking your education into your own hands is not only responsible and commonsensical, but downright crucial.

To seek or further one’s education is a choice, and luckily Socratic Logic makes it an easy to choice to make.

____________________________________________________________________
Footnotes:

[1] Bruce Lee, Edited by John Little, Striking Thoughts – Bruce Lee’s Wisdom For Daily Wisdom, p. 189.
[2] Peter Kreeft Ph.D., Socratic Logic, p. 14.

___________________________________________________________
If you find value in this information, please share it. This article is free and open source. All individuals have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Zy Marquiez and BreakawayIndividual.com
___________________________________________________________
About The Author:

Zy Marquiez is an avid book reviewer, inquirer, an open-minded skeptic, yogi, and freelance writer who aims at empowering individuals while also studying and regularly mirroring subjects like Consciousness, Education, Creativity, The Individual, Ancient History & Ancient Civilizations, Forbidden Archaeology, Big Pharma, Alternative Health, Space, Geoengineering, Social Engineering, Propaganda, and much more.

Another Step In Neuro-Electrical Stimulated Learning

GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
January 21, 2020

There’s been another step “forward” toward the transhumanist goal of uploading knowledge directly into the human brain, according to this article spotted by Mr. S.D.:

Scientists discover how to ‘upload knowledge to your brain’

In spite of the article’s headline, however, the actual achievement is slightly less than that:

Researchers from HRL Laboratories, based in California, say they have found a way to amplify learning, only on a much smaller scale than seen in the Hollywood film.

They studied the electric signals in the brain of a trained pilot and then fed the data into novice subjects as they learned to pilot an aeroplane in a realistic flight simulator.

The study, published in the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, found that subjects who received brain stimulation via electrode-embedded head caps improved their piloting abilities and learnt the task 33 per cent better than a placebo group.

…

“The specific task we were looking at was piloting an aircraft, which requires a synergy of both cognitive and motor performance.

“When you learn something, your brain physically changes. Connections are made and strengthened in a process called neuro-plasticity.

What caught my attention here was the deliberate choice of both cognitive and motor performance, so one wonders what such a technology will mean, for example, for instrumental musicians who must perform similar cognitive-motor function learning; for example, would the system enable a pianist to learn the third movement of Beethoven’s Emperor Concerto faster and perform it better?

In any case, we’re supposed to be comforted: we’re a long way from direct downloading and uploading of information according to the article. But I have to wonder just how far such a technology might have been taken in the black projects world. In my book Microcosm and Medium (available on Lulu.com), I pointed out that during the 1970s, brain research was carried on in connection to mind control research that compiled the brain wave signatures of people’s brains responding to, or using, specific words. By the end of these experiments, an “electroencephalographic dictionary” of about 2000 words had been compiled, allowing technicians to ‘read’ the intertior conversations that people had in their heads, and by wedding this technology to microwave transmissions, to actually project “voices in the head.” Over time, the vocabulary of such electroencephalographic dictionaries was doubtlessly expanded to include many more words. Indeed, the technology in today’s article suggests that one could use such a technology to enhance one’s vocabulary, or perhaps to learn a piece of music faster, and so on. Indeed, as I pointed out in my book, the Soviets did similar research, and specifically in connection to the arts, and the results were astounding, so much so that an individual who had no artistic experience whatsoever was convinced she was a Russian master classicist painter, and she began to paint accordingly.

So I don’t know about you, but I suspect once again that we’re being told the “safe stuff” and that the reality of these technologies perhaps far exceeds the public narrative.

See you on the flip side…

About Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Vaccines & Biowarfare

GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
January 17, 2020

If you, like me, have always suspected that the contemporary push to force everyone to take Big Pharma’s vaccines might somehow be connected to a biowarfare depopulation program, then you’ll want to read this article by Jon Rappoport, which A.F. passed along to me:

The leading authority on vaccines was in the biowarfare business?

And in case you missed the point on the end of the syringe, here it is again:

So let’s recall a little history, which helps illustrate the character of the CDC.

Character? What does that mean? Well, it could mean something like this: you read about a man convicted of murder some years ago, and then you discover he is now the chief of police…

Here’s a quote from the Washington Post (9/4/13, “When the US looked the other way on chemical weapons”): “…The administrations of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush authorized the sale to Iraq of numerous items…including poisonous chemicals and deadly biological viruses, such as anthrax and bubonic plague…”

Between 1985 and 1989, a US 501C3 firm, American Type Culture Collection, sent Iraq up to 70 shipments of various biowar agents, including 21 strains of anthrax.

Between 1984 and 1989, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) sent Iraq at least 80 different biowar agents, including botulinum toxoid, dengue virus, and West Nile antigen and antibody.

…

So…the CDC was up to its neck in the biowarfare business—and it later offered a lame excuse. You see, the World Health Organization was encouraging nations to exchange biological materials with one another, for ongoing medical research. Therefore, the CDC was OBLIGATED to ship those materials to Iraq—despite the fact that Iraq had an ongoing biowarfare program.

If you buy that little gem, I have condos for sale on the far side of the moon.

I confess that I’ve never fully understood the “logic” of the people who want to force vaccines on everyone. They claim they’re looking out for us, like that idiot in Senator Sanders’ campaign who wants to send all of us “deplorables” off to reeducation camps. People are forgetting that Darth Hillary made her own statements about “education camps” during the campaign. But my point is, there’s no lack of people who want to define what is good for everyone else, and I suspect they’re the same people who want to force vaccines on people and who want to control the narrative (Thanks to S.D. for spotting this one):

https://aapsonline.org/rep-adam-schiff-sued-by-physicians-for-censoring-vaccine-debate/

As I say, the logic bothers me, so let’s extend it: suppose Muck Pharmaceuticals has a new vaccine to cure …. gonnoherpesyphillaids, let’s say. They advertise their wonder drug on TV, and at the end of their commercial, we get thirty seconds of an auctioneer racing through the known side-effects, which could include stroke, heart attack, glioblastoma, or terminal flatulence, but that these occur in only 10% of the population (and therefore, that the climate change effects of their new drug are of minimal risk to the environment). Muck Pharmaceuticals pays off a lobbyist to pay off a few Congressmen, and voila, a national database is created for all gonnoherpesyphillaids sufferers and their physicians after a law that’s 30,000 pages long is passed by the House of Misrepresentatives behind closed doors in the middle of the night to the assurances that we have to pass it to find out all the wonderful stuff that’s in it, one of which wonderful things is the requirement that doctors must prescribe the new wonder drug, and gonnoherpsyphillaids patients must take the wonder drug. Similar provisions are made for all new wonder drugs for all conditions. And of course, Congress exempts itself from all the requirements of their own law, and also passes an admendment to the bill that prevents anyone from suing Muck Pharmaceuticals for any unknown and deleterious side effects that occur.

Meanwhile, in anticipation of the inevitable lawsuits to follow, quiet phone calls are made to the Chief Injustice of the Supremes, who is told he’d better play ball and be mindful of the legacy, or else, and he switches his vote and calls all of it a tax.

And we’re told that it’s all perfectly safe by the Food and Drug Misadministration and the Center for the Controlled Spread of Disease, which sidelines in a profitable “kinder, gentler biowarfare” business. And if anyone inside or outside of the Center for the Controlled Spread of Disease raises questions about all this policy, he suddenly disappears, and is later found dead, adding to a growing list of scores of people raising questions about the whole policy, whose deaths we’re all assured is merely coincidence.

And they wonder why we don’t trust them…

See you on the flip side…

About Joseph P. Farrell

Fusion Problems? Just Add A Pinch Of Boron

GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
January 17, 2020

Having trouble with your fusion tokamak reactor? Getting some inefficient reactions? Is the duct tape not stopping the plasma leaks? Well, relax, just add a pinch of boron to that pesky nuclear plasma, and the reaction efficiency will improve, according to this article spotted and shared by T.M.:

Powder, not gas: A safer, more effective way to create a star on Earth by Staff Writers

And in case you missed it, here’s the gist:

“The main goal of the experiment was to see if we could lay down a layer of boron using a powder injector,” said PPPL physicist Robert Lunsford, lead author of the paper reporting the results in Nuclear Fusion. “So far, the experiment appears to have been successful.”

The boron prevents an element known as tungsten from leaching out of the tokamak walls into the plasma, where it can cool the plasma particles and make fusion reactions less efficient. A layer of boron is applied to plasma-facing surfaces in a process known as “boronization.”

Scientists want to keep the plasma as hot as possible – at least ten times hotter than the surface of the sun – to maximize the fusion reactions and therefore the heat to create electricity.

Using powder to provide boronization is also far safer than using a boron gas called diborane, the method used today. “Diborane gas is explosive, so everybody has to leave the building housing the tokamak during the process,” Lunsford said.

“On the other hand, if you could just drop some boron powder into the plasma, that would be a lot easier to manage. While diborane gas is explosive and toxic, boron powder is inert,” he added. “This new technique would be less intrusive and definitely less dangerous.”

Now just imagine Julie Andrews reprising her role as Mary Poppins, and singing “Just a spoon full of boron makes the plasma react,” sung to the tune of “Just a spoon full of sugar makes the medicine go down,” and you get the idea.

But you may be thinking, “Gee, this boron-plasma thing sounds awfully familiar, but I just can’t put my finger on it.” Well, every now and then an article comes along that makes you revisit things you’ve already revisited. And today is no different. Let’s go back to my blog of April 12, 2011:

https://gizadeathstar.com/2011/04/things-that-make-you-say-hmmm-fusion-boron-and-richter-again/

So what we have here is an idea, from 1936 no less, that appears to have been recycled by that montebank and charlatan, the original fusion-fraudster, Dr. Ronald Richer, in Argentina. Here’s what I said in 2011:

In his endless statements to the USAF, however, Richter emphasizes how adding boron to his plasma soups increased the energy of his reactions. Well, so here we are, almost exactly sixty years later, and now we’re being told more or less the same thing. It really sort of makes one wonder, not only what the good Dr. Richter was really up to down there, but also, what the American Black Projects “community” did with it….

So, just add a pinch of boron to your plasma soup, and voila, a more efficient reaction, and one easier to control (as Dr. Richter also maintained). Now, as I also pointed out in 2011, the United States Air Force and the American scientific community didn’t quite know how to assess Dr. Richter:

Of course, Richter was roundly and publicly denounced by the scientific establishment for his claims, while secretly the USAF and Atomic Energy Commissions were investigating the man, and coming to a whole spectrum of conclusions about him, from “he’s nuts and a complete fraud” to “he’s a mad genius working in the 1970s”.

That stuff about Richter being “a mad genius working in the 1970s” is found in some of the Air Force documents I reproduced in my book The Nazi International in the chapters about Richter (Chapters 9 and 10). Only it would appear, from this article, that the American authorities may have been off by about five decades.

After all, T.M.’s submitted article was written at the end of 2019, and it’s looking more and more like the original fusion fraudster, Richter, may have been way ahead of the curve…

About Joseph P. Farrell

U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis Weighs Using “Kinetic Weapon” On North Korea

ActivistPost.com
Aaron Kesel
September 21, 2017

U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis hinted at using a kinetic weapon on Tuesday while discussing tensions with North Korea when he made a Freudian slip.

Mattis was asked whether there was “any military option the US can take with North Korea that would not put Seoul at grave risk,” Mattis responded, “Yes, there are, but I will not go into details.”

Later during the press conference, another reporter questioned Mattis and caught him off-guard:

“Just to clarify, you said that there were possible military options that would not create a grave risk to Seoul,” a reporter asked. “Are we talking kinetic options as well?”

“Yes, I don’t want to go into that,” Mattis responded.

Previously, Mattis stated that a war with North Korea would “involve the massive shelling of an ally’s capital, (South Korea) which is one of the most densely packed cities on earth.”

U.S. President Donald Trump in a speech to the United Nations on Tuesday threatened to “totally destroy North Korea” if Pyongyang didn’t quit its nuclear testing and threats.

This also comes after the U.S. and South Korea wrapped up its annual military drill harassing of North Korea, reminding the dictatorship of its military presence at its southern border.

In 2015, the U.S. Air Force confirmed that military contractor Boeing has an electromagnetic pulse weapon, which is capable of targeting and destroying electrical systems without the collateral damage of killing people. It’s essentially an EMP that takes out the power grid of a given area.

The project is known as the “CHAMP,” or Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project, and it already has been operational since 2015, according to Air Force Research Laboratory commander Major General Tom Masiello.

In January, Trump’s Air Force chief of staff revealed to USA TODAY that the U.S. President could use “space weapons against ISIS.”

“If we want to be more agile than the reality is we are going to have to push decision authority down to some lower levels in certain areas the big question that we’ve got to wrestle with … is the authorities to operate in cyber and space,” General David Goldfein, the Air Force chief of staff, told USA TODAY.

However, the U.S. also has other kinetic weapons in its arsenal that would allow Trump to “totally destroy North Korea” — one of weapons system is the “Rods from God.”

What is the Rods from God? The “Rods from God” is a part of the directed energy weapon family; it’s a kinetic energy weapon.

The rods are directed munitions, the higher you are (the greater your distance from the planet), the greater the kinetic energy you have.

In 2004, published in Popular Science, Eric Adams writes:

A pair of satellites orbiting several hundred miles above the Earth would serve as a weapons system. One functions as the targeting and communications platform while the other carries numerous tungsten rods–up to 20 feet in length and a foot in diameter–that it can drop on targets with less than 15 minutes’ notice. When instructed from the ground, the targeting satellite commands its partner to drop one of its darts. The guided rods enter the atmosphere, protected by a thermal coating, traveling at 36,000 feet per second–comparable to the speed of a meteor. The result: complete devastation of the target, even if it’s buried deep underground. The two-platform configuration permits the weapon to be “reloaded” by just launching a new set of rods, rather than replacing the entire system.

The concept of developing kinetic energy weapons has been around since the 1950s when the RAND Corporation proposed placing rods on tips of ICBMs, although the Pentagon won’t say how far along the research is, or even confirm that any efforts exist, citing those details as classified. The “U.S. Air Force Transformation Flight Plan,” published by the Air Force in November 2003, references “hypervelocity rod bundles” in its outline of future space-based weapons; and, in 2002, another report from RAND, “Space Weapons, Earth Wars,” talks about the effectiveness of such a weapon.

A space weapons agreement was proposed by Rep Dennis Kucinich called the “Space Preservation Treaty” in 2005 which states that countries won’t seek to weaponize space. However, that bill never made it past the introduction stage. Another House of Representatives bill known as the H.R.2977 “Space Preservation Act” was proposed in 2001 to ban the use of “exotic weapons” listing the following:

(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as — (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons; (ii) chemtrails; (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; (v) laser weapons systems; (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

Obama violated this agreement under the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act before leaving office, and no one noticed that the legislation he signed is essentially the Star Wars Defense Initiative II that his predecessor, Ronald Reagan, signed calling for a space-based missile system.

Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post and is Director of Content for Coinivore. Follow Aaron at Twitter and Steemit.

Vaccinegate: Italian Researchers find Fraud with 6-Combo Vaccine Given to Babies

HealthImpactNews.com
January 31, 2020

Italian scientists from an organization called Corvelva have published results from their investigation of the 6-combo vaccine, Infanrix Hexa, which is administered to infants.

They have shocked the world by claiming that their investigation shows that the ingredients in this popular childhood vaccine does not contain the antigens it claims, and also contains some toxic chemicals that are not listed as ingredients.

They are calling the results of their investigation “Vaccinegate.”

According to the European Medicines Agency:

Infanrix Hexa is a vaccine used to protect babies and toddlers against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), hepatitis B, poliomyelitis (polio) and diseases such as bacterial meningitis caused by the bacterium Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib).

Infanrix hexa contains the following active substances:

toxoids (chemically weakened toxins) from diphtheria and tetanus;

parts of Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis, a bacterium that causes whooping cough);

parts of the hepatitis B virus;

inactivated polioviruses;

polysaccharides (sugars) from Haemophilus influenzae type b.

But according to the scientists at Corvelva, the ingredient claims for this vaccine were not verified by laboratory examination:

In Infanrix Hexa we found

chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines;

chemical toxins;

bacterial peptide toxins;

insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.

We have not found:

Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3;

Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition;

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny discusses the overall backlash against vaccine fraud in Italy and how important this study is in the following video.

Vaccingate: Initial results on Infanrix Hexa chemical composition

by LE ANALISI
CORVELVA STAFF

When we started these analysis, from the metagenomics to the chemical ones, we had a lot of questions and we were only looking for answers… After these first results, more questions have arisen and so did the concerns!

The quali-quantitative analysis of organic compound is of great importance in the pharmacological field, as potential safety problems arise from the new production processes of biological drugs and from the complex structural and biological characteristics of these products.

In Infanrix Hexa we found

chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines;
chemical toxins;
bacterial peptide toxins;
insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.

We have not found:

Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3;
Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition;

In Infanrix Hexa there are six antigens

Tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis toxoids, D antigens of Poliomyelitis 1-2-3, hepatitis B proteins obtained with genetic engineering and Haemophylus polysaccharides chemically linked to tetanus toxoid as carrier. Toxoids are created by treatments with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde that should remove toxicity keeping intact their ability to stimulate protective antibodies against original toxins.

We were expecting to find the three toxoids and the other antigens not modified by treatment with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, to separate the antigens from each other and to be digestible by the enzyme specific for proteins (trypsin). We have found instead a real polymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens chemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of the individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in literature partial information regarding the single antigens.

This macromolecule could not be recognized in any way by the protein databases, and in fact it turned out to be a solid compound of an unknown chemical structure.

Proteins solubility and their digestion (i.e. the capacity to divide them into small peptide fragments) are two typical proteins characteristics that not only makes it possible to study them through some specific analysis methods but are also fundamental for the interaction with the immune system to create protective antibodies, because if the protein structure is heavily altered from the original one, the new antibodies result completely different from those that are able to attack the original antibodies causing illnesses.

Since this polymer we have encountered, derived from the antigenic mix, is not only different for its spatial conformation but it’s chemically different, so we can state that we are not facing antigens similar to the original ones but in the form of a compound with an unknown and unpredictable toxicity and efficacy.

Not only vaccine antigens have been not detected, there were also 65 signs of chemical contaminants of which only 35% is known, there are among these various processing residues and cross-contaminations from other manufacturing lines, and their identification will be checked during the second level of the analytical study (i.e. with standard controls).

7 chemical toxins among these signals have also been identified, probably deriving from chemical contaminants of the manufacturing process or other manufacturing lines at the vaccine manufacturing site; these toxins have a structure that could probably be partially derived from the formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and cyanogen bromide reaction with other chemical contaminants in the vaccine. We’d like to point out that the toxicity of many of these toxins have been confirmed and published in Pubchem or Toxnet and this poses important safety problems, issues and concerns.

From the protein and peptide fraction study, various free peptides of bacterial origin have been obtained probably coming from the bacterial culture cells used for the antigen extraction. Literature reports bacterial peptides as potential allergens 5 and also as capable of inducing autoimmune reactions 6 and these too put a safety issue that needs to be further clarified with the regulatory bodies.

Coming back to the two basic principles that have been our topic on this analysis path, we reaffirm what we have said in the recent interview on the scientific journal Nature: we are inquiring the vaccines efficacy and safety and we can’t quite understand how it is possible to claim that this vaccine is even able to generate the 6 protective antibodies – reason why it is designed for – and furthermore to understand how this cluster made of 6 neurotoxic antigens bound together can be claimed as not toxic for newborns.

Infanrix Hexa hexavalent, as for the method we have commissioned, casts major doubts on both its effectiveness and on its safety…

One thing is for sure: we will not stop to proceed.

Download: CORVELVA-Study-on-the-chemical-composition-profile-of-Infanrix-Hexa.pdf

Read the full article at CORVELVA.it.

Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.

References

J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017 Jun 1;1054:80-92 – The combined use of analytical tools for exploring tetanus toxin and tetanus toxoid structures.
Vaccine. 2007 Mar 8;25(12):2213-27. – Investigation of the detoxification mechanism of formaldehyde-treated tetanus toxin.
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/
https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/
Int J Med Microbiol. 2018 Aug;308(6):738-750. – The quest for bacterial allergens.
Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1938 – Morbid Sequences Suggest Molecular Mimicry between Microbial Peptides and Self-Antigens: A Possibility of Inciting Autoimmunity.

VACCINEGATE: AN ITALIAN PERSPECTIVE

GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
January 16, 2020

S.D. found this article, and if you’ve been following the mounting controversies over Big Pharma and vaccines, you’ll want to pay attention to this one. And, just for the record and to make my position clear for anyone unfamiliar with it, I’m not opposed to vaccines per se, but neither am I in the camp that (1) they should be forced on people, (2) that one should give cocktails of them to newborn infants, and (3) I do think Big Pharma has been deliberately covering-up and manipulating some of the science, particularly with respect to the vaccine-autism connection. I can perhaps illustrate my attitude by a personal anecdote. When I was a child, the only vaccine I ever received and that my parents would allow me to receive, was the polio vaccine, and here my parents decided on the Sabin, and not the Salk, vaccine, due to the problems with the latter that had been reported by the media in the day, and the advice of our doctor. He was an old-fashioned kind of doctor, and was loathe to pump infants and young children full of vaccines. In later life, I am one of those who never gets a flu shot. My mother did, faithfully, every year, and felt miserable and “down” for days after doing so. I finally persuaded her one year not to do so and see how she felt. Sure enough, the vaguely sick and tired feeling was not there.

More recently we’ve seen allegations in the alternative news media of all sorts of problems with vaccines, and of course, Robert Kennedy Jr. has been successfully suing over the issue.

But now vaccinegate took yet another dramatic turn in Italy with this story, and it’s a whopper-doozie:

The opening of this article says it all:

Italian scientists from an organization called Corvelva have published results from their investigation of the 6-combo vaccine, Infanrix Hexa, which is administered to infants.

They have shocked the world by claiming that their investigation shows that the ingredients in this popular childhood vaccine does not contain the antigens it claims, and also contains some toxic chemicals that are not listed as ingredients.

They are calling the results of their investigation “Vaccinegate.”

According to the European Medicines Agency:

Infanrix Hexa is a vaccine used to protect babies and toddlers against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), hepatitis B, poliomyelitis (polio) and diseases such as bacterial meningitis caused by the bacterium Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib).

Infanrix hexa contains the following active substances:

toxoids (chemically weakened toxins) from diphtheria and tetanus;

parts of Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis, a bacterium that causes whooping cough);

parts of the hepatitis B virus;

inactivated polioviruses;

polysaccharides (sugars) from Haemophilus influenzae type b.

But according to the scientists at Corvelva, the ingredient claims for this vaccine were not verified by laboratory examination:

In Infanrix Hexa we found

chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines;

chemical toxins;

bacterial peptide toxins;

insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.

We have not found:

Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3;

Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition; (Bold-italic emphasis added)

None of the listed ingredients were found, but what was found was chemical contaminants and toxins. I don’t know about you, but that appears to be outright fraud. And I’m not alone, the article implies the same

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny discusses the overall backlash against vaccine fraud in Italy and how important this study is in the following video. (Emphasis added, and I’ll leave it to you to watch the video)

As Dr. Tenpenny notes in her video, the complete absence of the actual antigens in the vaccine, and the presence of cross contamination, and unrecognizable macromolecules means that this “vaccine”, in addition to appearing to being fraudulent, it means that there is 100% risk and 0% benefit to the vaccine. Consider the following remark in this context:

Not only vaccine antigens have been not detected, there were also 65 signs of chemical contaminants of which only 35% is known, there are among these various processing residues and cross-contaminations from other manufacturing lines, and their identification will be checked during the second level of the analytical study (i.e. with standard controls).

7 chemical toxins among these signals have also been identified, probably deriving from chemical contaminants of the manufacturing process or other manufacturing lines at the vaccine manufacturing site; these toxins have a structure that could probably be partially derived from the formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and cyanogen bromide reaction with other chemical contaminants in the vaccine. We’d like to point out that the toxicity of many of these toxins have been confirmed and published in Pubchem or Toxnet and this poses important safety problems, issues and concerns.

Such findings are consistent with other studies in other countries of various vaccines, and remember, we’ve not even touched upon the autism issue.

The bottom line here is that Big Pharma is willing to completely lie about contents of its “vaccines.” Think of it as the medical equivalent of what the big banksters have been doing: masking their fraud and manipulation behind the power of coercive government, a kind of pharmaceutical version of FASAB 56 regulations, taking everything black, and putting you and your children at high risk, and then charging you an arm and a leg for their drugs when you get sick… from their drugs.

Trust these people? I don’t know about you, but as for me and my house, Absolutely NOT.

See you on the… oh, by the way, check out this Wikipedia article on Dr. Tenpenny; it sort of sums up the problem in “big medicine”: practicing physicians are given less “weight” than approved “papers” by approved “people” in approved “journals” financed by Big Pharma

Sherri Tenpenny

Funny, one wonders who in the Wikipedia “staff” went to medical school and actually practices medicine, and what their peer-reviewed papers are.

See you on the flip side…