Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
January 31, 2020

Earlier this week I blogged about the mysterious coronavirus outbreak in Communist China. I pointed out that in addition to the fact that the virus may have been stolen and weaponized by Chinese spies inside of Canada’s National Micriobiology Laboratory, there is an additional “coincidence” in that the outbreak appears to have occurred during the height of the Chinese lunar new year, when many people in China travel.

But now, there’s an even more uncanny resemblance between “simulation” and “reality”, and a big thanks to all who found and shared this:

Gates Foundation Simulated Exact Coronavirus Outbreak Scenario Last November With “Event 201”

What’s disturbing here is this paragraph:

In what has to be bizarre coincidence, in just November of last year, the Gates Foundation held a simulation called “Event 201”. Event 201 simulated an outbreak of a “zoonotic “coronavirus”. “Zoonatic” would be the spread of disease through animals (vertebrates).  (Italicized emphasis added, boldface emphasis in the original)

Additionally, as the article  observes, the outbreak apparently began in a nearby animal marketplace in Wuhan, close to the bioweapons laboratory.

All of this raises certain questions: did the virus accidentally leak from the laboratory? The article would suggest “no,” and as we saw earlier this week, the laboratory from which the Chinese apparently obtained the virus was in Canada, where the two alleged Chinese spies were caught, and expelled.

Which brings me to my high octane speculation of the day, and I suspect you all know what it is. In Monday’s blog, I pointed out the curious coincidence that one of the alleged Chinese spies at the Canadian laboratory hailed from Tianjin, the city that suffered the enormous chemical plant explosion that left a suspiciously deep and narrow “conical” crater. Now, we have another disturbing “coincidence,” The Gates Foundation’s unusual simulation, involving precisely a coronavirus, released into the general population via animals. The simulation’s close analogue to the actual outbreak itself suggests one of two scenarios: (1) the whole thing is “fake news” and an outbreak is being reported that may, or may not be, true, and hence, the simulation is ongoing as a kind of social engineering experiment, or (2) the whole thing is real, but not the result of an accidental leak in the Wuhan biowarfare lab in China, but of a deliberate leak.

And that raises the question, who did the presumptive leaking. Well, as I’ve written before in different contexts, covert operations are a game two can play: the Chinese can spy on “us”, and “we” can spy on them. And thus far, it is China that  has been the hardest hit, and as its government openly admits, it is taxing their resources. In Monday’s blog I also talked about another scenario in conjunction with the theft of the virus by the Chinese: perhaps their long term strategy was to release the virus, then announce “the cure.” But what if it is in fact the other way around? What if the “cure” already exists in western laboratories?

But either way one slices this story, nothing about it seems normal or kosher; someone is doing something to someone else… with time, perhaps, as the picture becomes clearer, we’ll know who might be engaged in biowarfare right in front of our eyes…

See you on the flip side…

Read More @


About Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.