“Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible Government.”
– Edward Bernays, author of Propaganda

“The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.”
– George Orwell

Piero Fornasetti City Of Cards 1955
Piero Fornasetti – City Of Cards 1955

Zy Marquiez
March 25, 2020

From the very nascent stage at the Corona virus was announced, I’ve had an incredibly askance stance about the whole issue.  Particularly given how easy it is for the mainstream media to parrot the same message without much thought put into it and even manipulate a messages outright, or for social engineering to take place throughout society.

Nevertheless, staying back until data accrues in tangible fashion is critical given how a lot of propaganda and fearmongering can (and usually does) take place early on in key stories.  Once you have something more substantial to sink your teeth into rather than simply hyperbolic headlines, it allows for the employment of mainstream sources to deconstruct the official story, rather than have to go into the rabbit hole, which to be fair might have to be done at times in order to dot-connect and so on.  Also, one of the vanguard reasons to remain skeptical of official stories is because often times not all of the information the mainstream establishment parades around is entirely ironclad.

For instance, many times, one can find glaring statements made by officials from within the actual mainstream health establishment that show part of the matrix for what it really is, such as this gem by the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet, Richard Horton, made in The Lancet  on April 11, 2015, in Vol 385, “Offline: What Is medicine’s 5 sigma?”:

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness…”[Bold & Underline Emphasis Added]

That is not the type of statement that the mainstream media will ever run with, especially given the fact that according to Robert F. Kennedy, 70% of News Advertising Revenue comes from Big Pharma.

Before moving forward, in the interest of giving credit where its due, I learned of the Richard Horton statement, as well as a lot of other pivotal information about the establishment from medical investigative reporter Jon Rappoport, the person that coined the term ‘Fake News’, and his NoMoreFakeNews.com blog.  Throughout my time reading Rappoport’s work, he has always been relentless in not only showing the frauds taking place throughout the system, but also makes it a point of employing mainstream sources that have impeccable credentials to really anchor down his point in a no-nonsense way.

And Horton, being the editor-in-chief of one of the most prestigious science journals in the world, qualifies as such an individual.  I would highly suggest individuals take a close and thorough look at Rappoport’s work, which might be quite sobering, but helps cut right through the BS regarding many abstruse subjects that society is faced with today.

Getting back o the main road, please keep in mind Horton’s incisive words:

“…much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”

Sounds outlandish, doesn’t it, almost like it came from someone in the conspiracy realm.  Except it did not, it came from a mainstream credentialed source.  Even before learning about Horton’s statement, as well as those of others, I was always skeptical of the establishment.

But now I realize that there are people within ‘the system’ that know something is incredibly wrong, and aren’t afraid to speak out, which is why I choose to listen.  For those reasons and others, a healthy dose of skepticism about the Coronavirus issue wasn’t just reasonable, but damn near mandatory given how much is riding on the line.  Nothing in recent memory made the stock market lose trillions, threatened to dent the global economy and left entire countries on lock down like the Corona virus issue has.  One would think, with all of that, the official story would be ironclad, but it is not.  Not when you look at it with discerning eyes and a mindful perspective.

Fortuitously, on March 17, 2020, STAT published an opinion piece entitled, “A Fiasco In The Making?  As Coronavirus Pandemic Takes Hold, We Are Making Decisions Without Reliable Data” by Stanford Professor John P.A. Ioannidis.  Professor Ioannidis, who is a meta-research specialist and co-director of Stanford’s Meta-Research Innovation Center, was unabashed in his stance that the official data early on with respect to the  in the Corona virus timeline was heavily slanted.  He went on to say that:

The data collected so far on how many people are infected and how the epidemic is evolving are utterly unreliable. Given the limited testing to date, some deaths and probably the vast majority of infections due to SARS-CoV-2 are being missed. We don’t know if we are failing to capture infections by a factor of three or 300. Three months after the outbreak emerged, most countries, including the U.S., lack the ability to test a large number of people and no countries have reliable data on the prevalence of the virus in a representative random sample of the general population.”[Bold & Underline Emphasis Added]

And when there was a closed portion of the population tested, which focused only on the elderly, he stated that:

Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 would be 0.125%.”[Bold Emphasis Added]

This is why he went onto to state that decisions are being made about COVID-19 without reliable data, which dances disastrously along the lines of what we heard from Horton’s own words shared in The Lancet years ago about information regarding health “may simply be untrue.”

In conjunction with that, the data Professor John P.A. Ioannidis sampled was problematic because:

“… this estimate is based on extremely thin data — there were just seven deaths among the 700 infected passengers and crew — the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%). It is also possible that some of the passengers who were infected might die later, and that tourists may have different frequencies of chronic diseases — a risk factor for worse outcomes with SARS-CoV-2 infection — than the general population. Adding these extra sources of uncertainty, reasonable estimates for the case fatality ratio in the general U.S. population vary from 0.05% to 1%.”

Translation: the official numbers are shaky at best, and even those could drastically change if other factors were brought about.

Lending credence to that argument is the serious selection bias because:

“Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes.”[Bold Emphasis Added]

But testing a significantly more accurate portion of the population would give up the charade, and bring the official agenda down like a house of cards.

Along the same lines, just recently Bloomberg recently ran a headline titled “99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness, Italy Says”.

In it, it was found that although “the medium age of the infected is 63”:

The average age of those who died from the virus in Italy is 79.5.”[Bold Emphasis Added]

Please read that again.

Moreover, only:

“0.8% of the total, had no previous pathology.”[Bold Emphasis Added]

That’s essentially a fancy way of saying that less than 1% of individuals had previous illnesses, implying that healthy individuals are almost never being affected by the CoronavirusLess than 1%.  Please keep that in mind

Why is that not a headline?  That wouldn’t engender fear, that doesn’t fit the official narrative.

When one junctions that information to the argument made in the previous piece by Professor John P.A. Ioannidis, where he focuses on the fact that:

“Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes.”[Bold Emphasis Added]

One can see that the focus in those key circumstances was the elderly, because that’s where the deaths are, that is where maximum fear can be generated.  But what would happen when the focus is made on a large reasonable sample of the population?  You probably can figure that answer out yourself.

Let’s ponder this differently, which of the bottom headlines engenders less fear:

“99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness, Italy Says”


“Less Than 1% Of People Dying From Corona In Italy Were Healthy People.”

Implication: healthy people will be okay.  But the establishment doesn’t want you to think about that.

Or how about a headline that stated:

“Most of The People Dying From Corona In Italy Are Older (~79.5) And Unhealthy”.

That headline is not unlike the first, but its focus is on age and illness, rather than just illness.  But that headline wouldn’t provoke fear, nor could justify the serious state overreach that is being attempted, or even a further extension of the surveillance state.

And when you fuse all relevant details together, the official story begins looking like exactly what it really is: a propaganda campaign to get everyone scared even though the virus clearly has a penchant for affecting older people with disease.

Remember, it was Italy’s total lockdown that helped push the propaganda campaign to the next level.  Don’t forget that, because without that, we probably wouldn’t be here, trillions of dollars wouldn’t have been lost globally to fear, entire countries wouldn’t be locked down, and livelihoods of many affected wouldn’t be teetering on the brink in select instances.

You might be asking, “Why is my focus primarily on Italy?”  Because although China was the tip of the spear with the Coronavirus, it was the situation in Italy that was the anchor that officially took the propaganda to a whole different level.  Mind you, just because there are a lot of cases with people that have the coronavirus, doesn’t mean that the death rate is high.

But the focus will usually always be on the cases, because the coronavirus issue sounds scarier that way.  However, if one were to focus on a death rate that’s probably realistically less than 1%, then the story collapses on its face.  More incisively, without the fear campaign, the medical systems of various countries wouldn’t have been overrun in such irresponsible fashion, which has probably created incredible issues that snowballed and affected people dealing with other diseases that kill more on average than the Corona virus globally.

However, Italy is unique in that the average age there is higher than a lot of countries because people there live longer lives on average, so the population is older.  An older population is the exactly the type of population that is at high risk to the virus.  So Italy’s medical system being overwhelmed makes a lot more sense than say than most places in the US, whose population is younger on average.

Be that as it may, there is a concerted agenda to manipulate the numbers towards what causes maximum fear.  I know a lot of this it is hard to believe, but bypass the headlines and look at the numbers with logic and reason and without fear, and you begin seeing how the official story is being held together by scotch tape and crazy glue.

Bottom line: don’t give into the fear and propaganda.  Do your own research.  Don’t be afraid to question, for in many cases it’s the only way you’re going to get to the truth.

And in a world where seeking the truth is an act of rebellion, it’s a breath of fresh air that we have the capacity to do so, and something that should never be taken for granted.   Because not only is censorship rising, but one day you might just lose access to the very information you need to figure things out.  Let’s end with something positive though, like the ability to figure things out for yourself.

Figuring things out for yourself unleashes a special type of power, a power that money can’t buy.  Truthseeking creates independence of the mind, the capacity to bring change not only for yourself, but for others.  That’s the type of power that the establishment doesn’t want you to create for yourself, because when you do, you start to realize that no matter what the mainstream media espouses, you are free to follow the threads of truth to wherever they lead and for any reason whatsoever.  That is because once you begin figuring things out for yourself you begin to dot-connect in a way that allows you to see the larger tapestry that lies behind the veil, the veil that the establishment doesn’t want you to pierce.

So why don’t you embrace your power, pull on those threads, and see what you find for yourself?

About Me:

Zy Marquiez is author of Amor Vincit Omnia – Love Conquers All, and also an avid book reviewer, poet, inquirer, an open-minded skeptic, health freedom advocate, and writer who aims at empowering individuals in many ways, while also delving deeper and regularly mirroring subjects like Consciousness, Education, Creativity, Individuality, Ancient History & Ancient Civilizations, Forbidden Archaeology, Big Pharma, Alternative Health, Space, Geoengineering, Social Engineering, Propaganda, and much more.

Add Me On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ZMarquiez
Follow The Page On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BreakawayIndividual/

Suggested Reading & Viewing:

Dr. Deborah Birx’s Coronavirus Propaganda: Does NOT Want People To Be “Reassured” Of Negative Tests
Coronavirus, Fearmongering, Hopelessness & Propaganda
The Rise Of Censorship By ISPs, Working Around Censors & More
7 Phenomenal Books For Homeschooling, Self-Directed Learners & Autodidacts
How TV Robs You Of Your Life
Have You Ever Walked On The Moon?
The Gift Of Truth, The Gift Of Friendship
The True Purpose Of Modern Schooling
WordPress Censorship
Catherine Austin Fitts’ Website Blocked By My ISP
Why The Incessant Propaganda Regarding Coronavirus, Especially Given Italy’s Latest Numbers? 
Quality Of Consciousness
Social Engineering, Censorship, Censorship Of The Solari Website & More
13 Great Reasons To Study Logic
Are You Living Your Dreams?
The Divide & Conquer Left Right Paradigm
What Is The Difference Between Education & Public Schooling?
How A Generation Lost Its Common Culture
Jon Rappoport’s NoMoreFakeNews.com Website Is Being Censored
Philosophy 101 by Socrates – An Introduction To Phylosophy Via Plato’s Apology By Peter Kreeft Ph.D.
How To Read A Book by Mortimer J. Adler & Charles Van Doren
A Different Kind Of Teacher by John Taylor Gatto
Logical Fallacies Employed In Every Day Life
The Imaginative Argument – A Practical Manifesto For Writers By Frank L. Cioffi
A Workbook For Arguments – A Complete Course In Critical Thinking by David Morrow
The Minds Of Men [Documentary] | Social Engineering & Mind Control
Manipulation Of Media Messages & Astroturf by Sharyl Attkisson
Mainstream Media Control
Zen Mind Beginner’s Mind by Shunryu Susuzi
Socratic Logic V 3.1 by Peter Kreeft PhD
Dialectical Thinking – Zeno, Socrates, Kant, Marx by Tommi Juhani Hanjijarvi Ph.D.
The Trivium – The Liberal Arts Of Logic, Grammar & Rhetoric by Sister Mary Joseph Ph.D.
Why Read The Classics?
Getting Things done by David Allen
Classrooms Of The Heart [Mini Documentary] – John Taylor Gatto
Dumbing Us Down by John Taylor Gatto
History So It Doesn’t Repeat – The Deliberate Dumbing Down Of America with Charlotte Iserbyt
The Catastrophic Decline of Public Schooling: 21 Facts Why School Performs Poorly
Mindset Musings#1: Venturing Outside Of Comfort Zones
Rotten To The Common Core by Dr. Joseph P. Farrell & Gary Lawrence
Lesson’s From Orwell’s 1984
Against Public Schooling – How Public Education Cripples Our Kids By John Taylor Gatto
Social Engineering 101
The Tavistock Institute – Social Engineering The Masses By Daniel Estulin
Sherlock Holmes by Arthur Conan Doyle
The Emergence Of Orwellian Newspeak & The Death Of Free Speech
What Is An Elite Curriculum?
A Mind Of Your Own – The Truth About Depression by Dr. Kelly Brogan
Social Engineering 101
Propaganda by Edward Bernays 
Drilling Through The Core by Sandra Stotski & Contributors
What Is An Elite Curriculum?
Invisible Influence by Kevin Hogan
The Secret Space Program & Breakaway Civilization by Richard Dolan