Note: I am familiar with the argument that Edward de Vere was in fact Shakespeare, but was uncertain how to go about editing this.

To that end, I ask: HOW does official history begin to change?

It’s a serious question, because official history also tells us that Muslims with box cutters were responsible for 9/11, that there was a ‘lone gunman’ responsible for the JFK Assassination, among other things. And those official stories have holes large enough to park a fleet of Star Destroyers with plenty of room, which can be verified through official documentation.

Even so, here’s a quick read as to just some of the extensive evidence of De Vere in fact being the one having written the work that is now is ascribed to Shakespeare.

Top Reasons Why Edward De Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford Was Shakespeare

Top Reasons Why Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, Was Shakespeare

Moreover, the argument for Edward de Vere, is FAR more concrete, when you get down to it, by orders of magnitude, than the traditional official history about Shakespeare.

But as always, just do your own research and come to your own conclusions.