Science – Breakaway Consciousness

Of Asteroids & Electrostatic Generators

GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
May 3, 2019

I’m always amazed at the ability of the “Gizars” to spot intriguing information, especially if it concerns technologies that don’t normally “show up on the radar” of the lamestream corporate controlled media, nor, for that matter, on the radar of the alternative research field. But L.G.R. spotted this one, and passed it along.

And it’s a doozie.

“It” in this case is a patent filing from 2017, rather blandly titled “Electromagnetic Field Generator and method to generate an electromagnetic field”, interestingly enough the assignee is the US government via the Secretary of the Navy.

Eletcromagnetic Field Generator

There are several intriguing things about this patent application, not the least of which are the first two paragraphs:

The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.

And why would the USA want to do that? Well, paragraph two provides the answer:

To date there are more than 100,000 potentially dangerous asteroids (Near Earth Objects) which cross the earth’s orbit, with only, 11,000 having been catalogued and currently tracked. earth will be impacted again and again; it is only a matter of time and circumstance. Therefore, there is a need for an effective method to deflect or destroy these potentially dangerous asteroids. (Emphasis added)

That, of course, reveals itself to be the purpose of the patent, and of course, if you’re like me, you’ve probably also noted the more or less “coincidental” appearance of this patent within a year of the Trump Administration’s creation of a “space force”. After reviewing a few other methods of deflecting asteroids in paragraph three, the patent description observes that “the techniques described… would only affect ‘small’ asteroids, on the average diameter levels of approximately 100 meters.” Implication: we need something that can take care of the really big ones, and that is not subject to the hazards of kinetic targeting (with its chances for a “miss”) and the resulting fragmentation of the asteroid, which could be as dangerous as the asteroid itself as many potential impacts would replace just one.

And thus, “the present invention is directed to an electromagnetic field generator and a method to generate an electromagnetic field with the needs enumerated above,” i.e., something strong enough to “deflect or destroy” a big asteroid. And when you read the details in the filing, you might, like me, be thinking that “this sounds vaguely familiar” and that it might “ring a Bell.”

Oh, and in case you missed it, it’s also a handy thing to have around for some “other” purposes:

It is a feature of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for generating an impenetrable defensive shield to Sea and Land as well as Space-based military and civilian assets, protecting these assets from such threats as Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles, Radar Evading Cruise Missiles, Top Attack for main battle tanks…

Oh…. did we mention, it’s capable of a little solar manipulation as well?:

…as well as counteracting the effects of solar-induced Coronal Mass Ejections… (Paragraph 0012)

Presumably it will do all this by generating electromagnetic fields, which, to accomplish all these feats, would have to be extraordinarily strong, but not to worry, because the “the design of energy generation machinery with power output levels much higher than those currently achievable by conventional means, is made possible with this invention.”(Paragraph (0012)

At this point, the patent goes on to outline how it’s going to do all of this, and lo and behold, it does so by spinning a plasma, utilizing shells in a sphere of peizoelectric ceramics doped with radioactive materials. Of course, I’m over-simplifying, but the end result of all of this is that this creates the Mossbauer Effect of vibrationally stimulated and cohered releases of gamma rays. All of this, according to paragraph 30, will generate field strengths per square meter of (get this) 10,ooo,ooo,ooo,ooo,ooo,ooo,ooo,ooo to 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 watts. That’s ten septillion to one hundred octillion watts.

Per square meter.

I dunno about you, but this seems to me to be quite a lot of deflection. Maybe even enough to “grab and throw”; it’s a handy thing to have around to “snag” an asteroid, mine it, and then throw it away. And you could make it do double duty: when you’re done mining it, you could throw it at someone you don’t like…

See you on the flip side…

The Red Mercury Saga: Russians Say Lithium-6 Was Red Mercur

GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
May 2, 2019

OK… I had to do at least one “fun” blog this week, and T.M. sent this article along, and I couldn’t resist. And it’s appropriate that the article is based on a report from those always-byzantine-never-to-be-trusted-Russians and their evil-super-genius-criminal-mastermind-martial-arts-expert-who-is-behind-all-conspiracies-of-all-the-ages ~~Dr. Fu Manchu~~ Vladimir Putin.

So what has Mr. Putin and his evil minions and lackeys been up to lately? Why, they now claim that all that red mercury scare that was the favored Nuclear Nightmare of the 1990s, and which occasionally resurfaces in a variety of contexts (most recently as the “culprit” behind those strange bridge fires in Atlanta a few years ago) was really simply a “code” for Lithium-6. But, as you might imagine, there’s a bit more to this story than meets the eye. Here’s the article, which, you’ll note, is really the abstract to an article:

‘Red Mercury’ is Lithium-6, Russian Weaponsmiths Say

And here’s the problematical part:

The name ‘red mercury’ is a code word used in the USSR nuclear weapons program since the 1950s to describe enriched lithium-6.

Well, that’s not really the only problematical part. There’s also this:

Lithium-6 has two nuclear weapons uses: as a reactor target for production of tritium, and in the form of lithium-6 deuteride as a thermonuclear weapon material. The most common production process uses large amounts of mercury as chemical agents. The code name originated because mercuric impurities contaminate the lithium- 6 during production, giving it a red color. ‘Red mercury’ has been identified by many European media reports as ‘any of several simple mercuric compounds and tinctures offered for sale by Russian and European agents,’ but none of these had any nuclear value. The uses for lithium-6 are consistent with claims about the uses of ‘red mercury.’ The USSR built a large complex in the early days of their nuclear weapon program to produce and stockpile lithium- 6. Some was also supplied to China in the 1950s. Russian and Western officials have both stated that no lithium-6 from Russian or Chinese inventories has been diverted since the disintegration of the USSR. (Emphasis added)

Well, what’s so problematical about that? To answer that question, we’ll have to take a short trip around Harvey’s Barn. In 2009 I published my book The Nazi International, in which I review the post-World War Two nuclear fusion research of Dr. Ronald Richter, which he was ostensibly conducting for Argentinian dictator Juan Peron. In 1951, Peron gave a press conference where he introduced Dr. Richter, and then made the extraordinary claim that Argentina had discovered the secret to the hydrogen bomb. The world’s press denounced Richter as a fraud, and so vociferous was the press response that Peron appointed a young Argentine nuclear physicist, Dr. Jose Balseiro, to head a commission to investigate Richter’s claims. Richter was indeed claiming to do the impossible – at least, by the lights at the time. He was claiming to obtain fusion reactions in a compound of lithium-6 (the rest of the compound was unspecified, but may have involved mercury) under extreme rotation and stress, and at temperatures far below that the standard thermonuclear chemistry of the period thought possible. In effect, Richter was making cold fusion claims some decades before Pons and Fleischman would do so.

Dr. Balseiro filed his report, basically pointing all this out, Richter was denounced as a fraud and placed under house arrest by Peron, and that was that.

Until the USA’s infamous Castle-Bravo h-bomb test, which ran away to a reaction of about 15 megatons’s yield, after a pre-detonation calculation of “only” 7-8 megatons. As I pointed out in The Nazi International, suddenly people in the USA became interested – very secretly interested – in Richter and his work again, and the US Air Force dispatched people to interview him. Meanwhile, the “cover story” of Castle Bravo was put out: the American thermonuclear bomb engineers had not factored in that the lithium-6 would burn in the reaction.

Woops.

Except, that Richter had made this prior claim, and now, the Russians are also implying that they too knew lithium-6 would burn in a thermonuclear reaction as early as the 1950s. Which means either the American story about Castle Bravo’s engineers being incompetent is probably yet another one of those narratives that has to be questioned, because it implies they fully knew and concocted a nonsensical explanation for it. And now we’re learning that mercury was used as a chemical agent in some unknown process involving the lithium-6.

It’s the presence of Richter in this mix that makes me wonder, once again, if there is not some truth in the red mercury legend, particularly in this current incarnation; it makes me wonder if some mercury “salted” with lithium-6-deuteride and then put into plasma form might not, in fact, under the right conditions, do what was always claimed for “red mercury”: detonate with enormous “quasi-nuclear” force.

Finally, most importantly, if this latest admission from Russia is to be believed, then it means one very important thing: the substance called “red mercury” was, and is, real.

See you on the flip side…

3D Printing Scrapbook: The First Human Heart 3D Printed

GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
May 4th, 2019

If you’ve been following the three-d printing/additive manufacturing story, and the genetic engineering story, you’ll be interested in this one. Frankly, I view it with a mixture of ambivalence, as being something that could be profoundly good, and profoundly bad. The story, as you can guess from the headline, is about the fact that some scientists have now 3-d printed the first artificial human heart. But there’s a catch here, and it’s a profound one, in this article shared by V.T.:

Major Medical Breakthrough: 3D Heart Printed Using Patient’s Own Cells and Materials

The engineered heart completely matches the immunological, cellular, biochemical and anatomical properties of the patient

In a major medical breakthrough, Tel Aviv University researchers have “printed” the world’s first 3D vascularised engineered heart using a patient’s own cells and biological materials. Their findings were published on April 15 in a study in Advanced Science.

Until now, scientists in regenerative medicine — a field positioned at the crossroads of biology and technology — have been successful in printing only simple tissues without blood vessels.

I was struck by the fact that apparently, no babies were aborted, ground up, and fetal stem cell tissue harvested to accomplish the feat, which seems all but par for the course for similar developments elsewhere in the world. And the utility of the accomplishment, using a patient’s own cells, is rather obvious, as the article points out:

For the research, a biopsy of fatty tissue was taken from patients. The cellular and a-cellular materials of the tissue were then separated. While the cells were reprogrammed to become pluripotent stem cells, the extracellular matrix (ECM), a three-dimensional network of extracellular macromolecules such as collagen and glycoproteins, were processed into a personalized hydrogel that served as the printing “ink.”

After being mixed with the hydrogel, the cells were efficiently differentiated to cardiac or endothelial cells to create patient-specific, immune-compatible cardiac patches with blood vessels and, subsequently, an entire heart.

According to Prof. Dvir, the use of “native” patient-specific materials is crucial to successfully engineering tissues and organs.

“The biocompatibility of engineered materials is crucial to eliminating the risk of implant rejection, which jeopardizes the success of such treatments,” Prof. Dvir says. “Ideally, the biomaterial should possess the same biochemical, mechanical and topographical properties of the patient’s own tissues. Here, we can report a simple approach to 3D-printed thick, vascularized and perfusable cardiac tissues that completely match the immunological, cellular, biochemical and anatomical properties of the patient.”

The researchers are now planning on culturing the printed hearts in the lab and “teaching them to behave” like hearts, Prof. Dvir says. They then plan to transplant the 3D-printed heart in animal models.

Of course, the implication here is obvious: if one can do this with hearts, one can do it for almost any organ in the body once they “wear out” and need replacement: “Maybe, in ten years,” the article concludes, “there will be organ printers in the finest hospitals around the world, and these procedures will be conducted routinely.”

Probably so. One can even envision a time or circumstance that the technology becomes so commonplace that the procedure becomes cheap, affordable, and can be done by “licensed organ printers” rather than doctors, in a kind of out patient procedure. And while we’re indulging in all this high octane speculation, one my even envision a kind of “organ dealership” or “Jiffy Lube,” a kind of drive-through organ replacement “garage,” complete with warranties and expiration dates, and so on.

Now, on the one hand, I can see that this developing technology is a good thing, because it extends life, and life is a good thing. Call me old fashioned, but I believe ardently in the sanctity of life. But it’s that, precisely, that also bothers me here, with the article’s own admission that one can envision a whole new branch of medicine emerging: organ-printing and replacement, and with it, a cheapening of life, a view that our bodies are so many collections of organs to be replaced when “worn out.” I wrote about this years ago, at the very end of my first “foray” into this strange alternative research field, in The Giza Death Star. I wrote about it in the context of a view of those ancient texts which record extraordinarily long life spans for our early ancestors. The biblical texts have humans living in some cases from half a millennium to almost a thousand years. In the Mesopotamian and Egyptian king’s lists, these life spans stretch tens of thousands and sometimes even hundreds of thousands of years.

And with the advent of this new “organ-printing and replacement” branch of medicine, once again modern science is providing a context from which to view those ancient claims as perhaps having a basis in a similar technological reality. But as I put it at the end of The Giza Death Star, the danger of viewing organs as so many replaceable “body parts” is what it does to the human spirit. As I warned then, the danger of becoming bored with life to the point of a kind of nihilistic anomie or antinomianism emerges, and one can imagine the emergence of a Hitler or a Stalin with thousands of years to perfect the evil in their souls. On can, of course, imagine a Francis of Assisi or Seraphim of Sarov perfecting their sanctity as well. It’s that potentiality that raises another high octane speculation: imagine also a “board” which must “approve” people to be recipients of such medical-technological boons. To be “approved,” one will have to have demonstrated holding the “correct opinions.” And given the fact that certain state legislatures are openly applauding the passage of full term abortion laws, and that certain state governors in this country are openly and calmly talking about “post-birth abortions” – infanticide – on television, one can fairly guess that people like Seraphim of Sarov or Francis of Assisi won’t be on the list of “acceptable recipients.”

See you on the flip side…

_______________________________________________
About The Author:

The Hidden Patterns of Creation [Part 1 & 2] – A conversation with Dr. Joseph Farrell

Source: ForumBorealis
April 26, 2019

Today we take on one of the largest philosophical mysteries; what Dr. Farrell [GizaDeathStar.com] refers to as the Topological Metaphor. In a roller coaster of a talk, we touch many aspects and derivatives of this fundamental structure of existence – historically, esoterically, theologically & politically. What is this fingerprint of Creation? Where do we find its traces? How is it best grasped through symbolism, numbers, music & geometry? Was it part of a prehistoric understanding? How does modern science relate to it? How is this open abundance system opposed to the closed scarcity system? And we learn about the first Unified Field Theory in known history!

The Hidden Pattern of Creation (Part 1 & 2) – A Conversation with Joseph Farrell (S06P02)
© Forum Borealis. May not be reproduced in any commercial way.

Guest: Dr. Joseph Patrick Farrell (http://www.forumborealis.net/#!guests…)
Video art: BlueGreen (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfej…)
Bumper music used with cordial permission from © Loopus.net (http://www.gokhankirdar.info/eng/)
This Program is part of our sixth series called EXPLORING ESOTERIC PHILOSOPHY (Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…)

: :: :: ::

FORUM BOREALIS = in depth conversations with the most interesting and important authors, researchers, & thinkers of today, who’s work often overlaps in areas including :

Health Solutions
Structures of Consciousness
Human Relationships
Innovative Culture
Front-Line Dissidence
The Crisis of Academia
Esoteric Philosophy
Planetary Mysteries
The Antediluvian Civilization
Covert History
The Deep State
The Black Economy
The Nazi International
Fringe Science
Anti-Gravity & Zero Point Energy
The Breakaway Civilization
The Classified Space Program

#Book Review: Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, And Secret Sorcery: The Fascist International, 9/11, and Penetrated Operations By Dr. Joseph P. Farrell | #SmartReads

BreakawayIndividual.com
Zy Marquiez
April 23, 2019

Long time readers of Dr. Joseph P. Farrell’s work have seen him tackle insurmountable tasks such as what the Nazi post-war machine has undertaken post-WWII, what the Great Pyramid Of Giza might be, and many more abstruse subjects. And his work still hasn’t stopped.

Now we have reached Farrell’s foray into the intriguing subject that is 9/11.

Farrell has tackled seemingly far-reaching aspects of history, esoteric science, et al., that seem not to correlate at first blush, but merged them quite well in his usual dot-connecting ways into a much vaster picture. This book follows along the same lines.

This is where Dr. Farrell’s latest book Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, And Secret Sorcery: The Fascist International, 9/11, and Penetrated Operations shines.

Farrell opens up covering many of the issues that are inherent to 9/11. Thereafter he gives us a synopsis of the similarities between the unfortunate Kennedy assassination and 9/11. What the author shows as parallels are indisputable in nature, and only serve to lay the groundwork for the rest of the book.

As Farrell elucidates, given the parallels in both coup d’etats, its sobering to consider that the events perhaps might be coupled to each other via certain nefarious groups.

From here the author proceeds to examine the two main theories behind 9/11 – the Let It Happen On Purpose hypothesis [LIHOP] and the Made It Happen On Purpose hypothesis [MIHOP].

Moving forward a bit more, the book sets the structure of arguing how behind the first two stratums of the operations that took place during 9/11, there lies a third stratum of wicked activity which displays a third player, or rather, group.

Farrell successfully argues that what took place was essentially the dethroning of the second rogue element by the third rogue element. Farrell shows how this was possible by analyzing data from various data points that go into how the American Military Defense Structure was compromised from the get go in myriad ways.

A lot of what Farrell postulates can be seen by the panic that the second rogue tier showed when they realized they weren’t the only game in town, which implied there had to be a deeper level – other players – involved behind the veil.

Being one to hold nothing back, after noting why the oft-mentioned controlled demolition theories have problems inherent within, Farrell goes on to voice how he instinctively felt more exotic technologies were unleashed, which he has hinted at in the past.

These very exotic technologies, and the group wielding them, are one of the main reasons why the 2nd tier rogue element – the one many folks think carried out 9/11 – panicked.

Of course, radical Islam – which itself has had elements of fascist social engineers in its past woven within – as we have seen, was to be the fall guy for the ‘War On Terror’.

Most interestingly, and what will surely be shocking to many, to quote the author in his own words “Thus I believe the second level of that 9/11 conspiracy, or own home-grown elitists, were once again played by fools by the outer and innermost ring of it, in a sort of “squeeze from below squeeze from above” methodology, a methodology that elite has used itself numerous times.”

Is this hard to fathom?

Having the financial clout [via its axis loot funds, and more], the technological know-how [via its scalar-torsion experiments going back decades], but more impotently, the ideology to carry out such events, is it REALLY a stretch to at least ponder that perhaps the Fascist/Nazi International could have had some dealings with the events of 9/11? Something worth pondering at length.

There are many other issues addressed by Farrell.

From the questionable circumstances with the alleged perpetrators, to an analysis of ‘Prescott’s Progeny’, to even weaving into many other facts regarding 9/11, and why some of those ‘facts’ just don’t sit right, Farrell attempts to leave no stone unturned.

The author thence deconstructs why some of the prevailing theories, are wrong, or rather, incomplete. One example of this is the “Bush & Cheney did it” theory bandied about by many.

One giant link in the chain addressed is how Mohamed Atta’s involvement shows threads of the third element involved in 9/11. How Atta connects to the third layer, is coupled by the undeniable connection Atta has with a mega conglomerate that regular readers of Farrell’s work will be familiar with. And as Farrell has addressed repeatedly on his website, he also touches upon how Saudi Arabia – regardless of its role in the events of that day – ‘was not alone’ in what was carried out, even though some even insist on this being the only country involved in that day’s chaos.

From there, Farrell goes on to address why the establishment would have held back information regarding one of the cartels founders. This would have undoubtedly shed light onto who else was involved in the events of 9/11.

Farrell also addresses how involved the Bushes were, or may have been. The way the author also sifts through Bush’s actions also showcases why his behavior was indicative of not only foreknowledge of the events of that day, but also of there possibly being another tier of terror involved. This is definitely something to ponder deeply.

One rather very notable point that Farrell harpoons revolves around theories that regard Flight 77, but can apply to many other issues out there if observed carefully.

Farrell astutely points out that, given the length of time the Fascist International has operated in a behind-the-scenes manner, it has undoubtedly learned some tricks in the last few decades. How this group tackles people addressing conspiracies – alternative researchers – shouldn’t be too surprising to open minded and skeptical individuals.

This is because a rather salient method of derailing research, or outright tarnishing it, would be for those very nefarious groups to infiltrate the very groups that seek truth. From there on, sinking the ship so to speak could be child’s play given how fast people run with theories without vetting, or even pondering deeply certain theories presented, or even how easy it could be to socially engineer a whole new ‘theory’.

The issue of infiltration within the truth movement is something that’s oft-glossed over, and that’s quite troublesome. There’s quite a few theories within certain disciplines that are rather obvious disinformation and misinformation campaigns to keep people chasing their tail, and it’s quite unfortunate because people follow these as a religion, without discussing other points of views, no matter how sensible [or even obvious] other points of views might be.

Along with the Flight 77, the Pentagon is also addressed at length, given how vital of a component the attack on the Pentagon was to the official story. Farrell tackles this from various angles, coupling the events that did take place also to the notorious Third Player whose fingerprints are ever-present all over the events of that unfortunate day.

Farrell also deconstructs the consistencies, and inconsistencies of the witnesses that took place on 9/11.

Many other chains of 9/11 are addressed by Farrell, from photographic evidence showing oddities, to mysterious websites, nefarious software that some will be familiar with, along with issues with a lot of the mainstream theories.

And still, there is a LOT more.

There really is countless angles to this, and it’s quite frustrating that many other people do not ruminate upon these.

Am not saying people NEED to agree with Farrell. The point is the LOOK at the various threads of evidence, and follow them to where the lead.

Often, in alternative research, a mere thread is pulled, but most ignore the entire web when those facts and/or theories threaten to shatter the preconceptions of how ‘reality’ and our world really works.

Whenever one pulls one thread of a larger component, the larger web always follows. This is what most dare not to indulge in, because by doing so would force people to come to terms with – or at least acknowledge – the fact that there’s not only smoke behind the fire, but there’s sometimes a blazing inferno as this book showcases.

Many are fond of saying follow the money, and that usually works rather well.

However, many are also fond of stopping dead on their tracks when they pull on threads that are uncomfortable. That’s quite ironic, given that in the whole realm of conspiracies everything is uncomfortable from various points of views.

That doesn’t mean theories need to be accepted. They should, however, be considered, pondered, studied, and addressed accordingly. It’s really the only sensible way we’re going to move forward as individuals, and hopefully, as a community.

Whether people want to admit it or not, there is a fascist component within the strata of 9/11, and to ignore it is to be willfully ignorant of what is buttressed by a considerable amount of evidence.

All in all, the author does a phenomenal job of addressing threads that go untouched by 9/11 research communities, and even setting forth ideas not contemplated before, but incredibly crucial to the main issue.

The wide net that Farrell casts, not only showcases the fact that there’s extensive evidence for a third shadow in the endless darkness, but also that this group is very capable, and worse, isn’t afraid of to use its advanced technologies for mass murder.

And if they’re still around…

___________________________________________________________

#Quote Of The Day | #Science | #Truth | #Education | #Learning

“Science, my lad, is made up of mistakes, but they are mistakes which it is useful to make, because they lead little by little to the truth.”
– Jules Verne

And The Latest In Mind Manipulation Is…Ultrasonic

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
April 19, 2019

Mind control technologies and techniques are all around us, and I suspect we saw the “application” of one such technique last Monday with the sad event in Paris. But imagine, being able to stage an event, and then be able to manipulate how one interprets and “feels” about it. Of course, that ability, too, has been part of the arsenal for some time, and it’s called “television.” Recall that on 9/11, before the twin towers in New York City even came down, that “interviews” were being conducted on the streets, and the talking heads in front of the green screens were all putting out the idea of the dangers of a “collapse” due to the “burning airplane fuel.”

But then imagine, in addition to this capability, the ability to use a television set not as a receiver receiving the “appropriate” interpretations, but also broadcasting base to beam signals directly into the mind of its viewer. I speculated on this idea in my book Microcosm and Medium because there is some basis in the patent literature to assume such a thing could be done, and it could be done relatively easily, using the television, the electrical power grid itself, and perhaps even those pesky 5G towers we keep hearing about, to broadcast a beat frequency, and the “message” is modulated into that beat frequency, thus allowing a convenient “cloak” to the activity as well, since the modulated information would not be discoverable in any one broadcast frequency. And of course, the whole idea of doing this requires one significant thing in the technology tree, an “electro-encephalogrpahic dictionary” of the brain wave patterns associated with specific words, emotions, and so on. That, as I also pointed out in Microcosm and Medium, they already have, the initial work on a 2000 “word” brainwave “dictionary” having been done in the 1970s.

Now, if that whole idea of modulated information on beat frequencies seems rather “iffy” and that I’ve gone off the end of my high octane speculation twig once again, consider this article discovered by K.M.:

Scientists change monkey minds using low-intensity ultrasound

Just consider the implications of the opening paragraphs of this article in conjunction with my “beat frequency” idea:

An incredible new study suggests that low-intensity ultrasound can be used to target very specific brain regions and alter an animal’s decision-making processes. The technique, demonstrated in macaques monkeys, prompts actual behavioral changes using non-invasive ultrasound waves.

It is only recently that researchers have begun exploring the effects of low-intensity ultrasound on the brain. Although it is commonly known for its imaging potential, ultrasonic waves can also be highly targeted to modulate brain activity. One exciting human trial is currently underway investigating targeted ultrasound as a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s and dementia, while a fascinating case study published in 2016 demonstrated the technology stimulating the neurons of a young coma patient, essentially “jump-starting” their brain.

And of course, this is all sold as being of wonderful health benefit. Indeed, I can imagine scenarios where having an “electro-encephalographic dictionary” sitting on the shelf would be appropriate from someone who for whatever reason cannot speak.

But if the implications of all of this do not give you pause, perhaps this will:

The research focused on a cognitive process called counterfactual thinking. This is a part of our decision making processes where we evaluate scenarios that are alternative to our current experience. The researchers give the example of imagining the alternative experience of spending time outside in the sun while working inside the confines of an office.

This specific cognitive process is vital in helping us assess all our available options and choosing the most positive future action. Some scientists hypothesize that psychiatric patients demonstrating repetitive dysfunctional behaviors suffer from irregular counterfactual cognitive processes. The new research set out to home in on where exactly in the brain this cognitive process occurs, and whether targeted low-intensity ultrasound can modulate the process. (All emphases added)

Let that sink in: the current ultrasonic neurostimulation research is focused on the region of the brain where counter-factual thinking and core decision-making processes occur.

Need a convenient false flag event to stage another bigger clamp down, and to justify the globaloney tyranny you’ve put into place in the UN buildings at Babylon-on-the-Hudson? Why, just turn on a few 5G towers and televisions in a particular region, even use the local power grid and modulate a little information into the power cables, do a little appropriate interferometry of all of the above and modulate “anger” and “rebellion” into the resulting beat frequency, ultrasonically neurostimulate the population in that region to revolt, then crush it unmercifully, and play and replay the videos on the ten o’clock news to reinforce the message.

And if you think for a moment that this has not been the objective from the beginning, then you need to go back and read the horrific vision of a psycho-stimulated society in Dr. Jose Delgaldo’s one – and thankfully only – book on the subject of mind control.

See you on the flip side…

About Joseph P. Farrell