Setting Depthcharges To The Foundation Of Official Stories: 9/11 | #Truth | #Simplicity | #MSM

“The lie is different at every level.”
Richard C. Hoagland

Propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government.”
– Edward Bernays

Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and the other way around to consider the most wretched sort of life.”
– Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

ExitingTheMatrix
BreakawayIndividual.com
Zy Marquiez
April 27, 2019

There are many moments when people pondering upon various theories of different large scale events tend to overcomplicate the information they hope to impart on another.  Instead of taking a simple approach in setting depth charges at the official story, they run up to the veritable dam of officialdom with a bb gun expecting to pierce it, when many times, simplicity works best.

For instance, there are many people that still believe the 9/11 official story, and many that do not.  Of those that do not, there’s some that end up trying to flood people’s minds with information so they can see that the official story has cracks all over the place.

Before going on, the goal of this post isn’t about going with any particular theory of who did what, when, where, why, and how.  The vanguard goal of this blog is to show that there are cracks and you don’t even have to go into the conspiracy realm to see them.

Depthcharge#1:  There were 3 buildings that fell, but only 2 airplanes that crashed.

Think about that long and hard.  No, really.  There were three buildings that fell, but only two airplanes that crashed into those buildings that fell [1].  Some people still don’t know this is the case.  I sure hope all of you know math because there’s no way three buildings can go down with only two airplanes unless there’s something ‘more than meets the eye’, to borrow a line from Transformers.

No matter how you slice it, the third building that wasn’t hit by an airplane had to be destroyed somehow, and that’s called a clue, a clue the size of Mars.

The official story never gets close to that, they want you to focus on the planes, on the ‘theatrics’ that the mainstream media propoundsBatman Begins covers theatrics rather saliently.  Using theatrics as a mirror for the mainstream media, Batman Begins is an excellent crash course into how theatricality and deception (employed by the MSM) can be used to make issues smaller than they seem (through limited hangouts) or larger than they truly are (anti-vaccination hysteria) all the while not reporting on what really matters (like preventable medical deaths being the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States).  And that’s barely the tip of the iceberg concerning mainstream media duplicity.

Now, inquiring minds would wonder why in the heck didn’t the mainstream media focus on how the third building that fell in 9/11, which was Building 7?  Because that would blow a hole in the official story the size of the Grand Canyon, so that has to be ignored, shunned into the dustbins of history, which leads me to point number 2.

Depthcharge #2:  The 9/11 Commission Report Doesn’t Mention Building 7

Anyone that has done any serious investigation into the 9/11 attacks knows that the The 9/11 Commission Report, does not mention building 7, at, all.  Say what?

In a world of common sense, logic, and critical thought abound, such a glaring omission couldn’t take place.  That’s like saying that one country launched 5 nuclear weapons against another, but somehow, the official investigation ‘forgot’ one of them.  If you really believe that then you should just click off and ignore this blog because we’re only going to burrow deeper into the rabbit hole, all using official mainstream information with follow up posts on myriad topics.

This is one of the vanguard points of this blog: to show that (1) there are significant problems within many official stories within the matrix, and these can be seen rather easily (2) by employing the very mainstream point of views that the comptrollers themselves use and often leave right in plain sight.

There’s no need to overcomplicate things when you’re trying to show people something is wrong.  The adage ‘baby steps’ goes a long way, and when coupled with simplicity, that’s a Tyson-like one-two punch that’s hard to top.  Overcomplicating an already incredibly complex topic by default is like willingly running your hand through a giant spider web while expecting the spider not the bite you.  No need to overcomplicate; just go around the spider web, go around the complexities of all issues and stick with the simplest ways that it can be shown that something is wrong.

Then, and only then, will people begin to wake up at a more rapid rate regardless what type of subject matter is discussed.  Where those individuals wish to venture too on the path of truth is of their choosing.  But most people will not even consider going on such a path if it’s littered with disinformation, misinformation, fake news, confusion, propaganda, overwhelming complexities and everything in between.

Offering people countless complexities simultaneously as answers when pondering official stories would be like if Neo was expected to swallow 20 Red Pills at once when he was talking to Morpheus in the classic Matrix scene of the first movie.

One red pill is much easier to swallow than twenty, even if they are all true.  So why overcomplicate things?

Just pull a couple of cards from beneath the official story, and watch the whole house of cards come crumbling down, watch the holes within the official stories become glaringly obvious.

And maybe you can even use those Aces you pulled from that house of cards to start something new, all with key facts, mainstream facts.

___________________________________________________________
Author Note:

[1] It goes without saying, that the Pentagon was also hit, but this building did not fall, which is why it wasn’t discussed in the first place.  The focus of the write up was to home-in on the three buildings that were destroyed.

___________________________________________________________

Suggested Reading & Watching:

9/11 – A Conspiracy Theory
What Is The Difference Between Education & Public Schooling?
Logical Fallacies Employed In Every Day Life
Dumbing Us Down by John Taylor Gatto
Weapons Of Mass Instruction by John Taylor Gatto
13 Great Reasons To Study Logic
How A Generation Lost Its Culture – by Professor Patrick Deneen
A Different Kind Of Teacher by John Taylor Gatto
Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft Ph.D.
Philosophy 101 by Peter Kreeft Ph.D.
Brave New World & Brave New World Revisited by Aldous Huxley
What Is Education?  The Elite Curriculum – John Taylor Gatto
Breakaway Guide To Censorship, Disinformation, Logical Fallacies & More
How To Read A Book by Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren
History So It Doesn’t Repeat – The Deliberate Dumbing Down Of America With Charlotte Iserbyt
Classrooms Of The Heart [Documentary] – John Taylor Gatto
Sumerhill School – A New View On Childhood by A.S. Neil
Social Engineering 101
Dialectical Thinking – Zeno, Socrates, Kant, Marx by Tommi Juhani Hanjijarvi Ph.D.
Underground History Of American Education With John Taylor Gatto
The True Purpose Of Modern Schooling
Getting Things Done by David Allen
Open-Source Method: Genius Education – Examples | John Taylor Gatto
The Trivium – The Liberal Arts Of Logic, Grammar & Rhetoric by Sister Miriam Joseph Ph.D.
Cultural Literacy – What Every American Needs To Know
by E.D. Hirsch Jr.
A Rulebook For Arguments by Anthony Weston
A Workbook For Arguments by David R. Morrow & Anthony Wesson
Drilling Through The Core – Why Common Core Is Bad For American Education by Sandra Stotsky & Contributors

___________________________________________________________
If you find value in this information, please share it.  This article is free and open source.  All individuals have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Zy Marquiez and  BreakawayIndividual.com

___________________________________________________________
About The Author:

Zy Marquiez is an avid book reviewer, inquirer, an open-minded skeptic, yogi, and freelance writer who aims at empowering individuals while also studying and regularly mirroring subjects like Consciousness, Education, Creativity, The Individual, Ancient History & Ancient Civilizations, Forbidden Archaeology, Big Pharma, Alternative Health, Space, Geoengineering, Social Engineering, Propaganda, and much more.

___________________________________________________________
If you find value in this information, please share it.  This article is free and open source.  All individuals have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Zy Marquiez and  BreakawayIndividual.com

___________________________________________________________
About The Author:

Zy Marquiez is an avid book reviewer, inquirer, an open-minded skeptic, yogi, and freelance writer who aims at empowering individuals while also studying and regularly mirroring subjects like Consciousness, Education, Creativity, The Individual, Ancient History & Ancient Civilizations, Forbidden Archaeology, Big Pharma, Alternative Health, Space, Geoengineering, Social Engineering, Propaganda, and much more.

More Strangeness About The Notre Dame Fire


Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
April 23, 2019

We’re still not at the stage we can move the sad story of the burning of Notre Dame from the “You Tell Me” tab to the “Call it Conspiracy” tab, but just so the record is clear, I’m right on the cusp. Thus far, I’ve had all sorts of weird stories emailed to me, including one that claimed that a famous international theme park operator and movie-maker wanted to donate to the rebuilding fund. As far as I can tell, M. Macron’s idea of turning this into an “international effort” was serious, and as far as I am concerned, extremely dubious. Let us be very clear here: yes, Notre Dame is very much a French monument; kings and queens worshipped there, Napoleon was crowned Emperor of the French there. But it is also and equally, if not preeminently, a Christian cathedral, a functioning temple of Roman Catholic worship; it was not a monument but a place of Christian worship. To open  any rebuilding process to some sort of “international committee” seems to me to be – up front – a sacrilege, the more so if the call to do so is coming from (dare I say it) a rootless cosmopolitan globaloneyist twit like Macron who by his own admission does not think there’s any such thing as French culture, which gives us a solid clue of what he might have to say about the wider Christian culture lying underneath, and that gave rise to, that Macronly non-existent French culture. Do we really want, for hypothetical example, Saudi money paying for a solid bronze plaque on the “rebuild” commemorating the generous donations of the companies with Mickey Mouse ears or Golden Arches? More to the point, should an un- and anti-French twit like Macron be allowed anywhere near a rebuilding project?

My little French paternal grandmother had a word for such ideas, which began with an “m”, and was followed by the German word for Earth.

And apparently I’m not the only one expressing some doubts over the Billionaire Busybodies’ Rebuild campaign:

Escobar: Now Comes The Notre Dame Of Billionaires

However, there is some good news for the rebuild effort in this article, shared by S.D.; it seems Notre Dame, in its entirety, was digitally scanned by lasers:

Professor Who Scanned All of Notre Dame Died Months Before Fire

But back to why I’m on the cusp of moving Notre Dame updates from the “You Tell Me” to the “Call it Conspiracy” tab, for this story was also spotted by S.D., and it raises some disquieting thoughts that, frankly, I and doubtless many others were having as we watched the cathedral burn:

Chief architect of Notre Dame: ‘We installed new detection system in 2010, and completely rewired the cathedral, so the fire wasn’t caused by electrical short-circuit’

What the cathedral’s former chief architect is responding to are stories like these about the ever-useful Glitch-ex-machina:

“Computer glitch” may be behind Notre Dame Cathedral fire, rector says – live updates

Between the two explanations, I’m obviously on the side of the architect. But wait, what kind of computer glitch ex machina are we talking about? Apparently, two, the one the started the fire itself, and then the other one, that sent the firefighters to the wrong place in the cathedral while the fire was burning somewhere else:

Notre-Dame fire: Firefighters ‘lost valuable time after computer glitch signalled blaze in wrong location’

So, yea, folks. I’m still on the cusp… but what I forgot to tell you is, that my body is leaning dangerously into the “call it conspiracy” territory, and I’m holding on to a rope tied on to a wall, hoping almost against hope that this was not a deliberately set fire, and that I come crashing down into the conspiracy territory.

See tou on the flip side…

Read More At: GizaDeathStar.com

_______________________________________________
Editor’s Note:

As alluded to in another post, it seems that there’s a lot more to this fire than meets the eye.  The vanguard signature that gave this away insensitively is the fact that, WITHOUT CONDUCTING AN INVESTIGATION, the fires were deemed an accident. 

In a logical world, in which procedures, protocols, and common sense prevails, it would take days, if not weeks or months to ascertain a potential answer.

But no, we live not in such a word.

Just like in 9/11, the answers were given hours after the incident with no investigation.  That alone should be a huge red flag, never mind all the accompanying factors.
_______________________________________________
About The Author:

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

#Quote Of The Day – #Politics | #History

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately.  Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something.  They know that there is a power somewhere – so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive – that they better not speak about their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
– Woodrow Wilson

#Quote Of The Day – #Politics | #Control

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately.  Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something.  They know that there is a power somewhere – so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive – that they better not speak above their breadth when they speak in condemnation of it.”
– Woodrow Wilson